Tag: Antibody detection

  • Human Immunodeficiency Virus 1 (HIV-1)

    The HIVs are retroviruses; their genetic information (genome) is composed of RNA rather than the usual DNA. To reproduce, the virus uses an enzyme known as reverse transcriptase to produce a DNA copy of its genetic RNA and incorporates this material into the host cell genetic material. Some of the copied viral genome also exists in the host cell without being incorporated into host chromosomes. Thus, the host cell nucleus reproduces the virus as well as itself. The HIVs have an unusual property, similar to the herpesvirus group, that active viral reproduction and infection can coexist with presence of antibodies against the virus. In most other virus infections, appearance of specific antibody marks the end of the infection and confers partial or complete protection against subsequent infection by that virus. The HIVs attack a subgroup of T-lymphocytes known as helper (inducer) T-cells (CD4 cells). Helper T-cells are important in cell-mediated immunity (delayed hypersensitivity), which is the immunologic mechanism classically defending against chronic lower virulence infections such as tuberculosis, fungus, and parasites. Monocytes, macrophages, and possibly Langerhans cells also become infected.

    The first HIV to be discovered was isolated from patients with the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) by three different groups of investigators who each gave the virus a different name (human T-cell lymphotropic virus type III, or HTLV-III; lymphadenopathy-associated virus, or LAV; and AIDS-associated retrovirus, or ARV). The current terminology for this virus is human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1). This virus is present endemically in Central Africa. A related virus that produces a syndrome similar to AIDS is found in West Africa and has been named HIV-2 (originally called HTLV-IV). The HIV viruses are related to a similar virus found in African green monkeys. They are also related, but less closely, to certain animal viruses called lenteviruses (“slow viruses”), of which the most well known is the visna virus of sheep. Besides the HIV virus group that injures or destroys helper T-cells, there is another group of viruses that affects T-cells but that causes excessive T-cell proliferation rather than destruction. This group has retained the name of HTLV and includes HTLV-I (which causes human T-cell leukemia) and HTLV-II (which may be associated with hairy cell leukemia). Similar to the HIV viruses, the HTLV virus group is related to a monkey T-cell leukemia virus and more distantly to a T-cell leukemia virus of cattle.

    Clinical findings

    HIV-1 can be isolated from many body fluids (including blood or blood products, semen, cervical secretions, saliva, tears, cerebrospinal fluid, breast milk, urine, and various tissues including the cornea). However, urine and saliva appear to have relatively little infectious capacity. HIV-1 is predominantly transmitted in three ways: by sexual intercourse (heterosexual or male homosexual), by transfusion or inoculation of infected blood or blood products, and by mother to fetus through the placenta. After exposure, there is an incubation period that typically lasts 2-6 weeks (range, 6 days-8 weeks, but sometimes lasting several months or years). In about 50% of patients (range, 4%-70%) this is followed by an acute viral type of illness (sometimes called the “acute seroconversion” or “acute HIV syndrome”) resembling infectious mononucleosis or CMV infection that usually lasts 2-3 weeks (range, 3 days-several weeks). Symptoms usually include fever, sore throat, and lymphadenopathy; often include skin rash, myalgias, diarrhea, vomiting, and aseptic meningitis; and sometimes thrombocytopenia. Some patients never develop the initial acute febrile illness or any clinical infection; they may recover completely from the initial exposure (although this is probably uncommon) or may become an asymptomatic carrier. Those who develop the initial acute illness exhibit a wide spectrum of possible outcomes. After recovery they may become asymptomatic carriers; may have defective immunologic responses without clinical disease; may develop persistent generalized lymphadenopathy (PGL); may develop a variety of non-life-threatening fungal, bacterial, or viral infections (e.g., oral Candida) as part of the so-called AIDS-related complex (ARC); or may develop the AIDS syndrome.

    AIDS is the most severe manifestation of HIV-1 infection, defined briefly as serologic evidence of HIV antigen or antibody plus certain opportunistic infections or Kaposi’s sarcoma (a malignant tumor of fibroblasts and capillary-sized blood vessels) in a patient who is immunocompromised without known cause. The most frequent opportunistic organism producing active infection in AIDS is pneumocystis carinii (about 60% of cases; range, 35%-80%); other common agents include Cryptococcus neoformans (4%-13% of cases), Candida albicans esophagitis (14%-25%), “atypical” mycobacteria of the Mycobacterium avium-intracellulare complex (22%-30%), and protozoans such as Toxoplasma(3%-12%) and Cryptosporidium (4%-13%). Other organisms with evidence of frequent past or recent infection include CMV (66%94%) and HSV (4%-98%, the lower figures being active infection). Incidence of Kaposi’s sarcoma varies according to risk group; in male homosexuals with AIDS the incidence is about 35% (range, 25%-50%) in clinical studies and 30%-75% in autopsy studies; but in drug abusers and hemophiliacs it is found in less than 5%. Some 50%-80% of patients with AIDS develop various types of neurologic disorders with or without dementia, which may precede other evidence of AIDS in 25% of patients. In one series, 66% of these patients had elevated CSF protein levels (42-189 mg/100 ml; 0.42-1.89g/L); 20% had a small degree of mononuclear cell count elevation (4-51 WBCs); and three of seven patients tested had oligoclonal bands detected in their CSF. Cerebral abnormalities were found in two thirds of the patients with AIDS who were autopsied. There is an increased incidence of B-cell lymphoma, especially primary CNS lymphoma (2%-6% of patients).

    In the United States as of 1992, about 58% of AIDS patients were male homosexuals, usually those who had multiple sex partners. About 23% were intravenous drug abusers; about 6% were persons infected heterosexually; and about 4% were of undetermined etiology. However, incidence of heterosexual infection (as opposed to current incidence of AIDS, a late-stage development of HIV-1 infection) is becoming more frequent. Infection has been reported after a single heterosexual encounter, although more commonly it takes more than one episode. After an infected person develops detectable antibody, the current approximate calculated progression to AIDS per year is about 2.5% for asymptomatic patients, 3.5% for PGL patients, and 8.5% for ARC patients. Progression to AIDS is highest among infected male homosexuals (4%-10%/year) and low among transfusion-infected hemophiliacs. About 20%-40% (range, 10%-73%) of infected mothers transmit the virus to the fetus during pregnancy. A few infants appear to become infected during delivery and some during breast feeding.

    Laboratory findings

    In the few small studies in AIDS patients that contain hematologic data, anemia was present in about 80% (range, 45%-95%), leukopenia in about 65% (range, 40%-76%), thrombocytopenia in about 25%-30% (range, 3%-59%; about 5%-10%, range 3%-15% in HIV-infected non-AIDS patients) and pancytopenia in 17%-41%. Lymphocytopenia was reported in about 70%-80% (range, 30%-83%).

    Diagnosis of HIV-1 infection

    Culture. HIV-1 can be isolated from concentrated peripheral blood lymphocytes and less frequently from body fluids. Isolation rates in already seropositive patients average about 50%-60% (range, 8%-100%; more likely positive just before or during the first half of the acute HIV syndrome). Culture is difficult, is expensive, takes several days, is available only at a relatively few laboratories, and is positive more often in early stages of infection than in later stages. Culture may be the only method that can confirm infection in the first 2-3 weeks after exposure. Culture detects only about 50% of neonates infected in utero in the newborn period up to the first month of life (range, 30%-50%) but a greater percentage at 3 and 6 months. Culture is positive in CSF from about 30% (range, 20%-65%) of seropositive adult patients whether or not CNS symptoms are present, but about 20% more often in more advanced states of disease.

    Antigen detection. Viral antigen may become detectable as soon as 2 weeks after infection (in one report it was detected 4 days after a transplant operation). Antigenemia (viremia) lasts roughly 3 months (range, 1 week-5 months). In several reports, antigen could be detected from a few days to as many as 6-9 months before first-generation ELISA antibody test results became positive. Several methods have been used, including RIA, fluorescent antibody, and ELISA. Until about 1990, sensitivity was usually less than 50% and varied considerably between kits of different manufacturers. It was discovered that varying amounts of the circulating p24 antigen were bound to immune complexes. Methods are now available that break up (dissociate) the bound complexes before testing. In one study this increased test sensitivity to 60%-65% in patients without symptoms and 80%-90% in patients with symptoms.

    Nucleic acid probe kits with PCR amplification (NA-PCR) have become available. These detect HIV antigen within infected peripheral blood lymphocytes. Sensitivity appears to be about 40%-60% in the first 1-2 weeks of life and up to 98% by age 3 months. NA-PCR detects about 96%-100% of seropositive pediatric patients over age 6 months or adult patients with CD4 counts over 800/mm3 and about 85%-97% of those with CD4 counts below 200/mm3. NA-PCR is more sensitive than culture in HIV-infected but seronegative patients and can detect HIV in CSF from about 60% of seropositive patients. As with all laboratory tests, all manufacturer’s NA-PCR probes are not identical in sensitivity.

    Antibody detection. Seroconversion occurs on the average about 6-10 weeks after infective exposure (range, 12 days-5 years), which corresponds to the last part of the acute HIV syndrome stage or up to several weeks afterward (in some degree depending on the sensitivity of the test). Two types of antibodies are produced, IgM and IgG. IgM antibodies are detectable first, and several studies report IgM antibody present in some patients 1-10 weeks before IgG antibody (using first-generation IgG ELISA methods). In general, IgM antibody becomes detectable about 1-2 weeks after onset of the “acute HIV syndrome” (about 5-6 weeks after infection), peaks about 2-3 weeks after first detection, and becomes nondetectable 2-4 months after first detection. IgG antibody becomes detectable 1-2 weeks after IgM antibody, peaks several weeks later, and persists for life (there is controversy over whether a few patients lose antibody shortly before death from AIDS). However, one recent study using a second-generation IgG ELISA found little difference. Commercial ELISA IgM, second-generation IgG, and rapid slide LA methods are now available. Many of these use antibody against one (sometimes more) selected protein components of HIV-1 obtained through recombinant DNA techniques (see Confirmatory Methods section). Test results in HIV-1 infection are shown in Fig. 17-10.

    Tests in HIV-1 infection

    Fig. 17-10 Tests in HIV-1 infection.

    The bulk of published test kit evaluations involve first-generation ELISA methods, which are based on crude extracts of the whole virus. There were a considerable number of such methods commercially available, but even the first was introduced in only mid-1985. These tests detect antibody in 94%-99.5% of patients with confirmed AIDS, depending on the particular assay and the investigator. Positive tests in random blood donors have averaged about 0.9% (range, 0.2%-2.56%). However, in some (not all) of these first-generation kits only about 25%-35% (range, 17%-44%) of initially positive ELISA test results on random blood donors remain reactive when retested with the same kit. Of those whose results were repeatedly positive, only about 20%-35% (range, 15%-62%) were positive on confirmatory tests. This means that only about 10%-15% (range, 3%-22%) of the initial positive results on random blood donors from these particular kits eventually were confirmed positive. Some manufacturer’s kits were shown to be more sensitive than others, and some produced more false positive results than others. Some of this discrepancy is explained on the basis of different appearance times or quantity present of different viral antigens being detected by the different kit antibodies being used. There is also controversy whether reactivity against only a single antigen or a certain type (e.g., the core proteins [“group-specific antigen” or gag] p24 and p55 or the envelope glycoproteins gp 120/160 and gp 41) is sufficient to consider the test truly reactive and thus indicative of HIV-1 infection in the absence of reactivity against any other important structural protein. When this happens, it is often considered a false positive or an “indeterminant” reaction, although its significance has not yet been definitely established. In addition to these controversies, definite false negative results and false positive results may occur. Previously mentioned have been false negative results due to variable time periods before antibody is produced and variation in sensitivity of different methods and different manufacturers kits. Also, in the late or terminal stages of AIDS, antibody may disappear from patient serum in about 2%-4% (range, 0%-7%) of those who previously had antibody.

    When HIV infection is acquired in utero, IgM (and IgA) antibody is slow to rise until 3-6 months after birth. In several reports, IgA was detectable in 6%-17% at one month of age, 57%-67% at 3 months, and 77%-94% at 6 months. IgG antibody was not helpful for the first 6 months of life (range, 3-18 months) because it may be acquired from the mother through the placenta. False negative and positive results can be due to technical and clerical errors. False positive results in some kits may be due to patient antibodies against certain HLA antigens (most often, DR4) in antigenic material from infected H9 cells used in the kits to capture the patient antibodies. Antigenic material from different cell lines or synthetic (recombinant) antigen does not have this problem. Some kits, but not others, have an increased incidence of false positive results in active alcoholic cirrhosis, renal failure, and autoimmune diseases. Gamma globulin used for HBV prophylaxis may contain antibody against HIV-1, although the gamma globulin is noninfectious due to certain steps in its manufacture. This passively transferred antibody may be detectable for as long as 3 months. Antibody detection methods for urine have been developed with sensitivity reported to be comparable to serum tests.

    Confirmatory antibody detection methods. Until 1988 these tests consisted of Western blot and immunofluorescent methods. Western blot is an immunochromatographic technique in which virus material from cell culture is separated into its major component proteins by electrophoresis, transferred (“blotted”) onto a chromatography support medium, and exposed to patient serum. Antibody in patient serum, if present, attaches to whatever virus component proteins it recognizes. Then the preparation is stained to display visually what protein areas had reacted. Not all the virus proteins are considered specific for HIV-1. There is some controversy as to what specific proteins must be present for the results to be considered definitely positive. This affects sensitivity of the test. The two most specific proteins are the virus envelope glycoprotein gp41 and the group-specific antigen (gag) core protein p24 (the numbers refer to molecular weight). However, other proteins, particularly a precursor envelope protein called gp160 (from which gp41 is derived), often appears before either of the more specific proteins. Western blot in general has been shown to detect antibody earlier than most of the first-generation ELISA tests but not as early as IgM or antigen-detection methods (or “second-generation” IgG tests). Unfortunately, Western blot is time consuming, takes 2 days to complete, and reliable results are considerably technique dependent. False negative and false positive results have been reported, although the exact incidence is currently unknown, due to lack of quality control surveys. The test is currently available only in large medical centers and reference laboratories. Immunofluorescence procedures are also available and are claimed to produce results equivalent to Western blot. Immunofluorescence is easier to perform and produces same-day results. However, a minority of investigators found Western blot to be more reliable. Both of these techniques are generally considered suitable to confirm screening test results. The Western blot, however, is currently considered the gold standard. There is also a radioimmunoprecipitation (RIPA) technique that has also been used as a confirmatory procedure. This method is slightly more sensitive than Western blot. However, it is technically difficult and currently is used only in research laboratories.

    Recently, tests have become available based on genetically engineered HIV proteins, most often gp160, gp120, gp41, and p24. One or more of these are used in “second-generation” ELISA or LA tests. In general, these tests are somewhat more sensitive and specific than the “first-generation” tests. One kit (HIVAGEN) consists of separate ELISA tests for antibody against several of these antigens, thus becoming, in effect, a sort of ELISA version of the Western blot.

    Tests for immunologic status. As noted previously, HIV-1 selectively infects T-lymphocyte CD4 cells (also called helper/inducer, Leu3, or OKT4 cells; CD means cluster designation), which eventually leads to defective immune function. CD8 T-cells (suppressor/cytotoxic or OKT8 cells) are normal or become increased. The 1993 CDC revised classification system for HIV infection considers 500 CD4 T-cells/mm3 or more to be normal; 200-499, moderately decreased; and less than 200, severely decreased. CD4 absolute or relative counts are considered to be the best index of HIV disease severity. Eighty percent to 95% of AIDS patients have a decreased absolute number of helper T-cells (<400/mm3) and a reversed (inverted) helper T-cell/suppressor T-cell ratio, with a T4/T8 ratio less than 1.0. One possible cause of false T4 decrease is the recent report that about 20% of African Americans have helper T-cells that fail to react with the OKT4 antibody but do react with the Leu3 and certain other helper T-cell antibodies. A lesser but substantial number of AIDS patients display more nonspecific immune system abnormalities, such as lymphocytopenia (<1,500/mm3) and nonreactivity to skin test challenge by standard delayed sensitivity antigens such as Candida, mumps, or Trichophyton. Tests of immune function usually do not become abnormal until relatively late stages of HIV-1 infection. These tests are not tests for HIV infection, nor are they diagnostic of AIDS. CD4 cell levels are currently considered the best overall indicator of HIV-1 disease severity and prognosis.

    Beta-2 microglobulin. Beta-2 microglobulin (B2M) is a small polypeptide that forms the light chain of the class I histocompatibility complex antigen (HLA) molecules present on the surface of many nucleated cells, including lymphocytes. It is released into serum by cell destruction or membrane turnover and is filtered by the renal glomerulus, after which it is more than 99% reabsorbed and metabolized by the proximal renal tubules. About 50% of serum B2M is derived from lymphocytes. Therefore, B2M levels have been used as a nonspecific marker for lymphocyte proliferation or turnover, as seen in immunologic stimulation or lymphoproliferative disorders. Since it is excreted by the kidney, it has been used to estimate renal function. Since CD4 (T-helper) lymphocytes are affected in HIV infection, B2M is reported to be elevated in about 85%-90% (range, 68%-100%) of patients with AIDS or ARC, 45% of patients with PGL, in smaller numbers of other persons with HIV infection but few or no symptoms, and in varying numbers of clinically healthy male homosexuals (20%-44% in two studies). Some investigators have used B2M as a marker for progression to AIDS, because in general the degree of B2M elevation corresponds roughly with degree of HIV illness severity and inversely with CD4 count. B2M can be assayed by RIA, EIA, or immunodiffusion.

    B2M may also become elevated in persons with poor renal function; in various lymphomas and leukemias, especially (but not exclusively) those of B-cell origin, in myeloma, in nonlymphoid malignancies, in sarcoidosis, in infectious mononucleosis and certain other viral infections, in various chronic inflammatory diseases including active liver disease, and in autoimmune disorders.

    Neopterin. Neopterin is an intermediate substance in the biopterin synthesis pathway. It is produced by macrophages when stimulated by gamma interferon released by activated T-cells (lymphocytes also produce neopterin but to a minor degree). Therefore, neopterin is an indirect indicator of increased T-cell activity. Neopterin is excreted by the kidney. Plasma or urine neopterin levels can be elevated in acute or active chronic infections or noninfectious inflammatory conditions, similar to B2M or C-reactive protein (CRP). The neopterin level is likely to be elevated in both viral and bacterial infection, whereas the CRP level is more likely to become elevated in bacterial than in viral infection. Also, the neopterin level is more likely than the CRP level to be elevated in immunologic graft rejection, whereas both become elevated in graft infection. In general, like B2M, the neopterin level becomes elevated in HIV infection; and the incidence and degree of elevation have a rough correlation to degree of HIV severity and inverse correlation to CD4 count. One reference states that the neopterin level is elevated in about 90% of seropositive but asymptomatic HIV-infected persons. Another found B2M elevated in 75% of these asymptomatic HIV patients and the neopterin level elevated in 60%; both were elevated in all ARC patients. B2M thus far seems to have aroused more interest than neopterin as a marker for severity in HIV infection.

    Summary of human immunodeficiency virus 1 tests. In summary, ELISA tests for HIV-1 antibody are used as a general screen to detect persons infected with HIV-1. Western blot (or equivalent) tests help establish presence of infection. Culture, tests for HIV-1 antigen, and possibly ELISA-IgM antibody tests, may detect infection earlier than the ELISA screening tests. Tests for decreased immunologic function (especially CD4 lymphocyte absolute counts) are useful to help confirm a clinical impression of advanced-stage HIV-1 and AIDS.

  • Diagnosis of Viral Diseases

    Culture. Until the 1980s, except in a relatively few cases the only available laboratory methods were culture and serologic tests for antibodies. There have been significant advances in culture techniques in the past few years, but most virus culture still is difficult and expensive. Culture is performed using living cell preparations or in living tissues. This fact in itself rules out mass production testing. Partly for this reason, facilities for culture are limited and are available mainly at sizable medical centers, regional reference laboratories, or large public health laboratories. In addition, culture and identification of the virus takes several days. Finally, cultural isolation of certain viruses does not absolutely prove that the virus is causing actual patient disease, since many viruses are quite prevalent in the general clinically healthy population. In these instances, confirmation of recent infection is helpful, such as presence of IgM antibodies or a fourfold rising titer of antibodies.

    Antigen detection. In the 1980s, several other diagnostic techniques that can detect viral antigen have appeared. These include electron microscopy, fluorescent antibody (FA or IFA) methods, enzymelinked immunoassay (ELISA), latex agglutination (LA) methods, and, even more recently, nucleic acid (DNA) probes (Chapter 14). These methods can provide same-day results. However, many of them are relatively expensive, especially the DNA probes, particularly when only one patient specimen is tested at a time. Except in large-volume reference laboratories, most institutions do not receive a large number of orders for virus tests in general; and with the possible exception of rubella, hepatitis B virus (HBV), human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1), Epstein-Barr virus (EBV), and possibly rotavirus, laboratories usually receive very few requests for diagnosis of any one particular virus. This makes it difficult for the average laboratory to keep reagents for testing many different viruses; and without having the advantage of testing many specimens at the same time, costs (and therefore, prices) are much higher.

    Antibody detection. In addition to culture and tests for viral antigen, serologic tests for antibody are available for most viruses. There are many techniques, including complement fixation (CF), hemagglutination (HA or HAI), radioimmunoassay (RIA), ELISA, FA, and LA. Some of these methods can be adapted to detect either antigen or antibody and either IgM or IgG antibody. Although they are considerably less exacting than culture, most techniques other than LA and ELISA monoclonal spot test modifications are still somewhat tedious and time-consuming. Therefore, these tests are not immediately available except at reference laboratories. Serologic tests have the additional disadvantage that antibodies usually take 1-2 weeks to develop after onset of illness, and unless a significantly (fourfold or two-tube) rising titer is demonstrated, they do not differentiate past from recent infection by the viral agent in question. One serum specimen is obtained as early in the disease as possible (“acute” stage) and a second sample is obtained 2-3 weeks later (“convalescent” stage). Blood should be collected in sterile tubes or Vacutainer tubes and serum processed aseptically to avoid bacterial contamination. Hemolyzed serum is not acceptable. To help prevent hemolysis, serum should be separated from blood clot as soon as possible. The serum should be frozen as soon as possible after collection to minimize bacterial growth and sent still frozen (packed in dry ice) to the virus laboratory. Here a variety of serologic tests can be done to demonstrate specific antibodies to the various organisms. A fourfold rise in titer from acute to convalescent stage of the disease is considered diagnostic. If only a single specimen is taken, an elevated titer could be due to previous infection rather than to currently active disease. A single negative test result is likewise difficult to interpret, since the specimen might have been obtained too early (before antibody rise occurred) or in the case of short-lived antibodies such as IgM, a previously elevated antibody value may have decreased to nondetectable levels.

    There is one notable exception to the rule of acute and convalescent serologic specimens. In some circumstances, it is desirable to learn whether a person has an antibody titer to a particular virus that is sufficient to prevent onset of the disease. This is especially true for a woman in early pregnancy who might be exposed to rubella. A single significant antibody titer to rubella suggests immunity to the virus.

    Two types of antibodies are produced in most, but not all, bacterial or viral infections. A macroglobulin (IgM) type appears first, usually shortly before or just after onset of clinical illness; reaches a peak titer about 1-2 weeks after clinical symptoms begin; and then falls to normal levels within a few weeks (usually in less than 6 months). A gamma-globulin (IgG) type appears 1 or more weeks after detection of IgM antibody. The IgG antibody reaches a peak 1-3 weeks (sometimes longer) after the peak of the IgM antibody. The IgG antibody typically persists much longer than the IgM antibody (several years or even for life). Therefore, presence of the IgM antibody usually indicates recent acute infection. Presence of the IgG antibody usually requires that a rising titer be obtained to diagnose acute infection (although in some diseases there are circumstances that alter this requirement), since without a rising titer one does not know whether the IgG antibody elevation is due to recent or to old infection.

    Special stains. The Tzanck test is sometimes requested in certain skin diseases associated with vesicles or bullae. One of the vesicles is carefully unroofed, and the base and undersurface of the vesicle membrane is scraped; the scrapings are gently smeared on glass slides. The smear can be stained with Wright’s stain or Giemsa stain; if so, the slide can either be methanol-fixed or air-dried. Papanicolaou (Pap) stain can also be used, in which case the slide must be immediately fixed in a cytology fixative. The slide is then examined microscopically for multinucleated giant cells or characteristic large abnormal rounded epithelial cells. If found, these are suggestive of herpes simplex or varicella-zoster infection.

    Viral test specimens

    The type of specimen needed for viral culture depends on the type of illness. In aseptic meningitis, a CSF specimen should be obtained. In addition, stool culture for virus should be done, since enteroviruses are frequent causes of meningitis. In enterovirus meningitis, stool culture is 2-3 times more effective than CSF culture.

    In any kind of meningitis with negative spinal fluid cultures or severe respiratory tract infection of unknown etiology it is a good idea to freeze a specimen of serum as early in the disease as possible. Later on, if desired, another specimen can be drawn and the two sent for virus studies. As noted, serum specimens are generally drawn 2 weeks apart.

    In suspected cases of (nonbacterial) encephalitis, whole blood should be collected for virus culture during the first 2 days of illness. During this short time there is a chance of demonstrating arbovirus viremia. This procedure is not useful in aseptic meningitis. Spinal fluid should also be sent for virus culture. Although the yield is relatively small in arbovirus infections, the specimen results sometimes are positive, and culture also helps to rule out other organisms, such as enterovirus. In upper respiratory tract illness, throat or nasopharyngeal swabs are preferred. These should be placed in trypticase broth (standard bacterial medium). Swabs not preserved in some type of medium such as trypticase or Hank’s solution are usually not satisfactory, since they dry out quickly, and most viruses are killed by drying. Throat washings or gargle material can be used but are difficult to obtain properly. In viral pneumonia, sputum or throat swabs are needed. If throat swabs are used, they should be placed in acceptable transport solutions. Whether throat swab or sputum is used, the specimen must be frozen immediately and sent to the virus laboratory packed in dry ice. In addition, a sputum specimen (or throat swab) should be obtained for Mycoplasma culture (Chapter 14).

    In possible viral gastroenteritis, the most logical specimen is stool. At present, rotavirus and Norwalk viruses cannot be cultured from stool, but stool can be examined for Norwalk virus by immune electron microscopy and for rotavirus antigen by RIA, ELISA, or slide LA. Serologic tests on serum can be used for diagnosis of rotavirus infection, but only a few laboratories are able to do this. Whenever a stool culture for virus is needed, actual stool specimens are preferred to rectal swabs, since there is a better chance of isolating an organism from the larger sample. Stool samples should be collected as soon as possible—according to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control (CDC), no later than 48 hours after onset of symptoms (to ensure the best chance of success). The stool specimen should be refrigerated, not frozen; and if sent to an outside laboratory, the specimen should be shipped the day of collection (if possible), and kept cool with dry ice. However, it is better to mail any virus specimens early in the week to avoid arrival on weekends. An insulated container helps prolong effects of the dry ice.

    An adequate clinical history with pertinent physical and laboratory findings should accompany any virus specimen, whether for culture or serologic studies. As a minimum, the date of clinical illness onset, collection date of each specimen, and clinical diagnosis must be included. The most likely organism should be indicated. This information helps the virus laboratory to decide what initial procedures to use. For example, some tissue culture cell types are better adapted than others for certain viruses. Considerable time and effort can be saved and a meaningful interpretation of results can be provided.

    Certain viruses deserve individual discussion. The method of diagnosis or type of specimen required for some of these organisms is different from the usual procedure, whereas in other cases it is desirable to emphasize certain aspects of the clinical illness that suggest the diagnosis.

  • Antibody Detection Methods

    There are two methods of detecting and characterizing antibodies: (1) the direct Coombs’ test and (2) a group of procedures that try to determine if an antibody is present, and if present, attempt to identify the antibody by showing what the antibody will do in various controlled conditions.

    Direct Coombs’ test

    To prepare reagents for the Coombs’ test, human globulin, either gamma (IgG), nongamma (IgM), or a mixture of the two, is injected into rabbits. The rabbit produces antibodies against the injected human globulin. Rabbit serum containing these antihuman globulin antibodies is known as Coombs’ serum. Since human antibodies are globulin, usually gamma globulin, addition of Coombs’ serum (rabbit antibody against human gamma globulin) to anything containinghuman antibodies will result in the combination of the Coombs’ rabbit antibody with human antibody. There also has to be some indicator system that reveals that the reaction of the two antibodies has taken place. This can be seen visually if the Coombs’ rabbit antibody has been tagged with a fluorescent dye; or if the reaction takes place on the surface of RBCs, lysis or agglutination of the RBC can be produced.

    The direct Coombs’ test demonstrates that in vivo coating of RBCs by antibody has occurred. It does not identify the antibody responsible. It is a one-stage procedure. The Coombs’ serum reagent is simply added to a preparation of RBCs after the RBCs are washed to remove nonspecific serum proteins. If the RBCs are coated with antibody, the Coombs’ reagent will attack this antibody on the RBC and will cause the RBCs to agglutinate to one another, forming clumps. The antibody on the RBC is most often univalent but sometimes is polyvalent. Although antibodies on RBCs that are detected by the direct Coombs’ test are most often antibodies to RBC blood group antigens, certain medications (e.g., methyldopa and levodopa) in some patients may cause autoantibodies to beproduced against certain RBC antigens. Also, in some cases antibodies not directed against RBC antigens can attach to RBCs, such as antibodies developed in some patients against certain medications such as penicillin or autoantibodies formed in the rheumatoid-collagen diseases or in some patients with extensive cancer. In addition, some reports indicate an increased incidence of apparently nonspecific positive direct Coombs’ reactions in patients with elevated serum gamma globulin levels.

    The reagent for the direct Coombs’ test can be either polyspecific or monospecific. The polyspecific type detects not only gamma globulin but also the C3d subgroup of complement. Complement may be adsorbed onto RBCs in association with immune complexes generated in some patients with certain conditions, such as the rheumatoid-collagen diseases and certain medications, such as quinidine and phenacetin. Monospecific Coombs’ reagents are specific either for IgG immunoglobulin (and therefore, for antibody) or for complement C3d. If the polyspecific reagent produces a positive result, use of the monospecific reagents (plus elution techniques discussed later) can narrow down the possible etiologies.

    The direct Coombs’ test may be done by either a test tube or a slide method. The direct Coombs’ test must be done on clotted blood and the indirect Coombs’ test on serum, since laboratory anticoagulants may interfere. A false positive direct Coombs’ test result may be given by increased peripheral blood reticulocytes using the test tube method, although the slide technique will remain negative. Therefore, one should know which method the laboratoryuses for the direct Coombs’ test.

    In summary, positive direct Coombs’ test results can be due to blood group incompatibility, may be drug induced, may be seen after cardiac valve operations, and may appear in rheumatoid-collagen diseases, malignancy, idiopathic autoimmune hemolytic anemia, and other conditions. The overall incidence of a positive direct Coombs’ test result in hospitalized patients is reported to be about 7%-8% (range, 1%-15%).

    The main indications for the direct Coombs’ test include the following (most are discussed later in detail):

    1. The diagnosis of hemolytic disease of the newborn.
    2. The diagnosis of hemolytic anemia in adults. These diseases include manyof the acquired autoimmune hemolytic anemias of both idiopathic and secondary varieties. Results of the direct Coombs’ test at normal temperatures are usually negative with cold agglutinins.
    3. Investigation of hemolytic transfusion reactions.

    In these clinical situations the indirect Coombs’ test should not be done if the direct test result is negative, since one is interested only in those antibodies that are coating the RBCs (and thus precipitating clinical disease).

    Antibody detection and identification

    Indirect Coombs’ test. The indirect Coombs’ test is a two-stage procedure. The first stage takes place in vitro and may be done in either of two ways:

    1. RBCs of known antigenic makeup are exposed to serum containing unknown antibodies. If the antibody combines with the RBCs, as detected by the second stage, this proves that circulating antibody to one or more antigens on the RBC is present. Since the RBC antigens are known, this may help to identify that antibody more specifically.
    2. Serum containing known specific antibody is exposed to RBCs of unknown antigenic makeup. If the antibody combines with the RBCs, as detected by the second stage, this identifies the antigen on the RBCs.

    The second stage consists in adding Coombs’ serum to the RBCs after the RBCs have been washed to remove nonspecific unattached antibody or proteins. Ifspecific antibody has coated the RBCs, Coombs’ serum will attack this antibody and cause the cells to agglutinate. The second stage is thus essentially adirect Coombs’ test done on the products of the first stage.

    Therefore, the indirect Coombs’ test can be used either to detect free antibody in a patient’s serum or to identify certain RBC antigens, depending on how the test is done.

    The major indications for the indirect Coombs’ test are the following:

    1. Detection of certain weak antigens in RBCs, such as Du or certain RBC antigens whose antibodies are of the incomplete type, such as Duffy or Kidd (see antibody screen).
    2. Detection of incomplete antibodies in serum, either for pretransfusion screening or for purposes of titration.
    3. Demonstration of cold agglutinin autoantibodies.

    The indirect Coombs’ test is almost never needed routinely. In most situations, such as cold agglutinins or antibody identification, simply ordering atest for these substances will automatically cause an indirect Coombs’ test to be done. The indirect Coombs’ test should be thought of as a laboratory technique rather than as an actual laboratory test.

    False positives and false negatives may occur with either the direct or indirect Coombs’ technique due to mixup of patient specimens, clerical error when recording results, technical error (too much or not enough RBC washing; also failure to add reagents or adding the wrong reagent), contamination by 5% or 10% glucose in water (but not glucose in saline) from intravenous tubing, and, rarely, use of faulty commercial Coombs’ reagent.

    Antibody elution. When a direct Coombs’ test yields positive results, especially when thecause is thought to be a blood group–specific antibody, it is desirable to attempt elution (removal or detachment) of the antibody from the RBC to determine the antigen against which it is reacting. This is usually done by changing the physical conditions surrounding the antibody to neutralize the attachment forces. The most common current methods are heat, freeze-thaw, and chemical. Once the antibody is isolated from the RBCs, it can be tested with a panel of RBCs containing known antigens to establish its identity.